Showing posts with label onebornfree's financial safety reports. Show all posts
Showing posts with label onebornfree's financial safety reports. Show all posts

Friday, November 18, 2016

What’s Next: Deflation, Inflation, or Hyperinflation?




Bill Bonner [in 2015] : "Recently, one of our dear readers summarized the three major points of view, along with one minor one:

Deflation Camp

Harry Dent is in line with the Austrian Business Cycle Theory: Money printing causes financial bubbles, distorts the economy, and is therefore counterproductive.
Like Bob Prechter (I don’t follow him closely, but his argumentation sounds similar), Dent bets on deflation and depression.

Fighting debt deleveraging and demographics is like putting yourself in front of a tsunami.
In such an environment, the U.S. dollar would gain purchasing power, and gold would underperform significantly. (Harry sees it back to $700 in 2018-19.)

Cash/T-bills/short-term Treasurys are the place to be. Rates will stay low for very long.

Inflation Camp

Jim Rickards’ thesis – “inflate debt away via a massive issuance of SDRs after China has joined the club” – is also very credible.

World currencies are massively diluted via issuance of SDRs, which serve only the powers that be. Rather than a new gold standard, this is the solution to Triffin’s dilemma (more flexibility for the elite).

[Triffin’s dilemma describes the constant need for the global reserve currency issuer – in this case, the U.S. – to supply the world with reserve currency by way of a long-term trade deficit. Eventually, argued Yale economist Robert Triffin, this would lead to a loss of confidence in the reserve currency.]

Citizens are excluded/not allowed to own SDRs. Their purchasing power shrinks. They don’t know who to blame.

The IMF does not consist of elected officials, and the majority of the population doesn’t even know it plays a role in creating inflation. And they can pretend that they have to save the world, too. (Remember the Greek bailout?)

Hyperinflation Camp

Shadow Stats’ John Williams is having a really hard time fighting for his ideas. He is right about the “CPI-CP Lie” and the current true state of the economy. But whoever invests along his ideas is running out of capital to stay in the game.

Peter Schiff and Mike Maloney are on a similar line. The problem with them is that they have a conflict of interest with their businesses. But I have no doubt about their integrity: They do/live what they say.

Deflation to Hyperinflation Camp

I recall an interview with Nassim Taleb on Bloomberg TV in 2009 when he said, “We will go from deflation to hyperinflation without seeing inflation.”

Tokyo to Buenos Aires

Our view is that Taleb will be proved right.
Back in 2009, we predicted “Tokyo… then Buenos Aires” – a Japan-like deflation, followed by Argentine-like hyperinflation.

Most likely, there will be no stop in between for moderate levels of inflation.

Inflation, as economist Milton Friedman observed, is “always and everywhere” a monetary phenomenon. But hyperinflation is a political phenomenon.

It is caused by those same authorities the masses think they can trust. When they are threatened, they will protect themselves by printing money on a scale we haven’t seen since the War Between the States. (Consumer prices in Richmond, Virginia, had risen 6,700% by the end of the war.)

There are times when printing money seems like the best course of action – especially for the people running the printing press. It may not do the common man any good, but it gets the feds out of a jam."

http://www.bonnerandpartners.com/whats-next-deflation-inflation-or-hyperinflation/


Financial Safety Services Commentary:

Fact: For fundamental reasons, to do with human action and markets,_nobody_ , but nobody, can reliably and consistently predict future economic events; not Dent, Schiff, Prechter, nor Taleb, yourself,  or anyone else.

Fact: It’ not necessary to be able to predict the economic future to safeguard one’s long term savings from an unknown , and unknowable, economic future:

Regards, onebornfreeatyahoo
                                          
                                  Financial Safety Services Disclaimer


Friday, July 4, 2014

The Stockholm Syndrome Vs. You,Your Money,Your Freedom


[Financial Safety Services and Freedom Network commentary: this excellent article by world traveller Simon Black does a good job of explaining some of the psychological barriers which prevent a person from making the important step of moving at least some portion of their own finances and business dealings offshore- if not offshore, to at least get some of it outside of any part of the financial system within the country you presently live in. If you would like to discuss specific aspects of the article via email, Skype , or in person, please let me know at:onebornfreeatyahoodotcom, and I'll see what I can do. Regards, onebornfree.]

                                             


 "

In August 1973, Jan-Erik Olsson walked into the main branch of Kreditbanken bank in central Stockholm, Sweden and attempted to rob the place at gunpoint. 



He failed miserably. 

When the police arrived in short order, Olsson opened fire and injured one of the cops. This only escalated the situation. 



In desperation, Olsson took four people hostage, and they were held for six days at the bank until police finally used gas to subdue the captors. 



This sort of thing happens all the time, so it's hardly noteworthy. But what's unique about this event is that the hostages later said they actually felt safer with their captors than the police. 



The victims had, in fact, become emotionally attached to Olsson and his partner, to the point that they even publicly defended the pair after the ordeal was over. 



As it turns out, this is actually fairly common. Psychologists call this 'Stockholm Syndrome' after the Kreditbanken robbery; the term denotes a traumatic, positive bond that forms between captors and hostages.

 

To those of us who have never been held hostage, it almost seems fantastical... even intellectually offensive. Seriously, how could anyone ever develop endearing feelings for someone holding you at gunpoint? 



But when you think about it, this is the very nature of patriotism. 

Through an entire lifetime of bombastic propaganda, complete with songs and flags and parades, people develop an unquestioning commitment to the state. 

They'll say things like 'this is the freest country in the world' without a shred of objective evidence to support that conclusion... and overwhelming evidence to the contrary. 



But meanwhile, we're all held at gunpoint. 

Spy agencies monitor our phone calls and emails. Central bankers manipulate markets and destroy people who are responsible enough to save. 

Politicians confiscate people's livelihoods, regulate them to the hilt, authorize discretionary assassination of their own citizens, and actively work to destroy any vestiges of personal liberty. 



While everyone is allowed to roam around, work, and buy flat-screen TVs, we're all ultimately handcuffed by the state. 

Everything in our entire lives-- from the value of our savings to our homes and personal property, to even our personal freedom-- can all be confiscated in their sole discretion. 



I'd be willing to bet the chickens scratching around my yard right now think that they're free... and have no idea that they'll be this evening's dinner. 

This is a hostage situation, plain and simple. 



Yet they've skillfully managed to create bonds of affection. The hostages are standing tall, waving the flag, and defending the government's absurd, destructive actions... no matter how much they defy reality.

 

It's gotten to the point that the hostages have begun talking about government actions in the first person: 

'There's no way "we" would ever default...' 

'In this country "we're" innocent until proven guilty...' 

'Airport security makes "us" safer from terrorists...' 

'WE should invade Iran...'

 

Hostages have become so inured to the violence of our captors that few people even realize that it's happening. 

The fear and intimidation tactics have just become part of daily life. 



This is really hazardous thinking. Hostage situations are dangerous. When things start getting bad, the captors become desperate and start sacrificing their prisoners.

 

Candidly, our courses of action are limited. 

One can simply hope that the situation will improve, and that you won't be one of the hostages that gets slaughtered. 



Conversely, you can head towards the big, giant EXIT sign and leave the whole situation behind for greener pastures. 



Or, you can bear down and stick it out... but at least have a credible escape plan. Reduce your exposure to the captors. Don't have all of your eggs in one basket. 



It costs you nothing, for example, to move a portion of your savings abroad to a safe, stable bank in a jurisdiction that your home government does not control. 



It costs you nothing to pursue an 'ancestry' passport in the event that your parents or grandparents hailed from certain countries like Ireland or Italy. 



Yet in the event that the hostage crisis escalates, it's these sorts of steps that will end up paying enormous dividends for you... and pave the way to freedom."


Simon Black 
Senior Editor, SovereignMan.com

                FINANCIAL SAFETY SERVICES DISCLAIMER



More About "Onebornfree":

"Onebornfree" is a personal freedom consultant a problem solver, and a musician. He can be reached at: onebornfreeatyahoodotcom  .

Music Info: 

Onebornfree's [aka Fake-Eye D"] Music channel
 

Home studio recording example "Somewhere Over The Rainbow Blues"[2014 Remix]:

Other 2014 "Studio" Remixes:

"The Thrill Is Gone"

"Face In The Crowd Blues"

Live, solo example [own composition "Dreams [Anarchist's Blues]:


Youtube link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0o-C1_LZzk


Onebornfree Personal Freedom Blogsites: 

                                                                                         




Monday, November 18, 2013

Bill Bonner: "Repeat After Me: Economics Is NOT a Science"


[Financial Safety Services commentary: more accurately economics is a science, however, it is strictly a social science, not a physical science like chemistry or physics, as the Austrian economist Ludwig Von Mises clearly and succinctly explained in his classic "The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science". I personally feel that for savers, investors and speculators, the most important  ramification of this particular realization is that because economics was not, is not and can never be included in the "hard science" category along with physics and chemistry, it can in no way be a reliably predictive "science", as are those "hard sciences". Which means that the social science of economics can in no way accurately, consistently predict the economic future, as many economists, and many "investment  advisors" would have you believe it can. This great article by Bill Bonner goes a long way towards explaining, in simple, none-technical terms for you, the realities of this economic "science". Regards, Onebornfree & Financial Safety Services.]
                                                        FINANCIAL SAFETY SERVICES DISCLAIMER
                                                                    Bill Bonner

"On Monday and Tuesday, we visited our youngest son, Edward, a sophomore at the University of Vermont. His roommate joined us for dinner.

“Okay, let me explain it to you,” we said.

The roommate was wondering if he should switch his major to economics.

“Economics is a phony science. The more you study it, the more you think you know… and the less you really know about how an economy actually functions.

“I’ll explain why in just a few sentences.

“If you are a real scientist, you start with things you can know… and you can build on them.

“Water boils at 212 degrees Fahrenheit at sea level, for example. The molecules heat up… then suddenly change from liquid to gas… and the pot boils. Right? Happens every time. You can count on it. And with this knowledge, you can build a steam engine.

“So, the simpleminded economist comes along and says, ‘Hey, an economy is like a pot of water! You heat it up… you get more activity… and GDP grows.’

“The analogy holds up superficially. You heat up the economy by putting some fire under it. If you’re a central banker, you lower interest rates. If you’re a politician, you increase the deficit.

“You know there’s a risk of overheating… or causing a bubble. But you think you understand how it works. You think you can predict and control the outcome because you’re a scientist who uses mathematical models, just like a real engineer.

Nobody Knows Anything

“But the problem is you don’t know anything. You don’t know if an economy really is like water. You don’t know where sea level is. For all you know, you’re high in the Alps. And you don’t know whether the fuel you’re using adds to the fire… or subtracts from it. QE, for example, may help heat up the economy. Or it may not. No one knows for sure.

“And get this. All those little molecules, you know – those individuals in the great economic pool? As soon as they catch on to what you’re doing, they will change their behavior. That’s the big difference between water and people. Water does the same thing no matter what you say or what you think. People don’t.

“We talk about the economy being like water. Well, try to imagine the contrary. Imagine water as though it was like a real economy. Imagine that the water knew you were going to bring it to a boil. Then instead of turning into vapor at 212 degrees, it might boil at 100 degrees or 170 degrees or 50 degrees in anticipation.

“And then, after you’ve brought it to a boil a few times, the water gets sick of being manipulated like this… and it boils off if it even suspects you’re thinking of warming it up.”

The kid started to fidget and look away. He was afraid he had run into some cranky old nut job who was going to keep talking all morning.

“Well, I guess I’ll stick with engineering.”

“Good idea.”

Regards, Bill 
Original article source
                     
                 FINANCIAL SAFETY SERVICES DISCLAIMER



More About "Onebornfree":

"Onebornfree" is a personal freedom consultant a problem solver, and a musician. He can be reached at: onebornfreeatyahoodotcom  .

Music Info: 

Onebornfree's [aka Fake-Eye D"] Music channel
 

Home studio recording example "Somewhere Over The Rainbow Blues":Youtube link : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2oS9iI2zWU

Live solo example [own composition "Dreams [Anarchist's Blues]:

Youtube link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0o-C1_LZzk


Onebornfree Personal Freedom Blogsites: 
                                                                                         

Sunday, May 26, 2013

Revisiting The "Swiss Banks Are Not Safe for U.S Depositors" Scam

[N.B. Financial Safety Services has no professional affiliation with any bank, Swiss or otherwise, anywhere in the world.]


Main Goals of the Scam: 



1]:To scare US citizens into abandoning offshore bank accounts [even though it is still perfectly legal for them to have one] and to "repatriate" their offshore finances. 

In other words, big U.S banks are behind all of this, to no less an extent than the government itself- the banks obtain more fees from their new, scared , ex-offshore banking, customers.


2]: "Sheep shearing", i.e to "beat the bushes" and scare US persons  using  legitimate offshore banks in Switzerland and elsewhere into finally "coming clean" and paying even more money to the Federal behemoth than they already do, so that just like the banks themselves, the government gets more money [i.e. tax revenues]. 

Also, it is far easier for the US government to seize funds from a customers account within a fully cooperative US based bank that is threatened, than it is for it to do the same to an entirely foreign bank outside of direct US government influence.

 Timing:

As in all government scams, for maximum psychological effect, timing is crucial in the scam/shearing operation.

Because the US "tax day" deadline is  set for April 14th, typically [actually, like "clockwork" every year], the scam usually starts in the New Year and builds momentum  January through March to its final crescendo of  attention-grabbing headline status by April 14th. or so, as a scary reminder to all "good" [i.e. extremely gullible] US citizens to pay their "fair share" of taxes, and not to be naughty girls and boys and try to bank offshore, because according to those annual headline-grabbing, intentionally fear-inducing headlines, the US government can grab any/all offshore accounts it feels like, whenever it feels like it - even in Switzerland, despite its 600-odd year history of banking privacy for all  non-criminal, depositors.

 How The Scam Works: The "Straw Man" Set Up


The scam works by setting up a "straw  man"[ or "straw men"] , who most people will, out of sheer  ignorance, believe to be the genuine article, then have the U. S government attack [or "put pressure on"] said straw men, who then predictably,  cave in to that pressure after a suitable amount of resistance on their part.

The media  [i.e the propaganda arm of the U.S government] then dutifully broadcasts the caving in of the straw men and this is then broadcast as "proof positive" that other, seemingly similar 

 institutions [to the uneducated, anyway], are just as vulnerable as the straw men who have now caved to the demands of the U.S. government.

This Years [2013] Two Favorite Straw Men? : Credit Suisse and U.B.S.

This time around, there appear to be at least two straw men: Credit Suisse and U.B.S.  therefor, pre April 14th we have had stories like this one appearing in places like The Wall Street Journal, implying that your money is no longer safe in any Swiss bank.

U.S Behind The Pressure Put On German Depositors?

Allthough the journal Article focusses on the ongoing trials and tribulations between German depositors and these two particular straw men, the implication is that the exact same demands from these institutons apply to U.S depositors  at U.B.S. and Credit Suisse- which they do, of course.

In actuality, and in all liklihood, the U.S. government   persuaded  the German government to apply pressure in  a "quid pro quid" arrangement to both their benefits. The timing of these "bush beating" escapades makes me suspect direct US involvement in what is happening to German depositors at these two institutions [Unless maybe the Germans also have an April income tax filing deadline or similar.]

Forget Most "Alternative" and "Free Market" Commentaries Too!
 

And by the way, even some of the the "alternative" "free market" financial press appears to have been fooled by the latest US government shenanigans, as these articles from The Daily Bell clearly show . [Which just goes to show, and no differently from any other news source, don't believe everything you read on an "alternative" "free market" website either.]: 





Financial Privacy Anyone?:

If you want financial privacy via an offshore bank account [for whatever reason], and while it is still legal to do so, do not open such an account with any bank that has ANY branches in the US, or even has branches in an overseas territory at the mercy and influence of the US government.  



Confiscation/ Seizure of US Citizen Depositors Funds


Remember also, any bank account held in the US or overseas that is subject to US law , in any US regulated domestic or foreign bank branch [ie still subject to US law], can be easily frozen, or even confiscated ", merely on suspicion", pre-trial, even pre-sentencing, by virtually any federal agency or by any federal judge, literally on a whim.



Exactly Why Are Credit Suisse and U.B.S. U.S Government "Straw Men" [ and therefor extremely vulnerable to U.S government pressure] ?  :
I've written about this before, and why it is not true [and can never be true] that all Swiss Banks are susceptible to the same political pressure being applied to Credit Suisse, U.B.S. and their clients, by the U,S. bank lobby, via the U.S. government, here.

 I see no need to repeat myself at this time. So if interested in this subject please read my previous article hereThe article is free for you to read. 

Still Don't Get It?

However if you are unable to "read between the lines" there, I'm afraid I would have to charge you for my time spent explaining further :-) !

Happy [and safe and private] offshore banking everyone.

Regards, Financial Safety Services.
*****************************
FINANCIAL SAFETY SERVICES DISCLAIMER:

Financial Safety Services is NOT an investment advisory service. Financial Safety Services is an educational service that teaches the interested individual non-original [i.e. invented by others far more intelligent than myself], time-tested safe methods/principles that might be successfully used by the individual for relatively low risk speculations in various financial markets.

ACCURACY OF INFORMATION : Financial Safety Services MAKES NO CLAIMS AS TO THE ACCURACY OF ANY INFORMATION EITHER GIVEN AT THIS BLOG SITE, OR IN PERSON TO PAYING CLIENTS. All information given/sold, must be understood to have been acted on AT THE INDIVIDUALS OWN RISK .

********************************************************************

More About Financial Safety Services

[Free phone consultations via "Skype". To set a time/date email: onebornfreeatyahoodotcom ]
Financial Safety Services is a private , mostly off-line, international, person to person consulting service that attempts to show its real-time [i.e. non-internet derived] clients how to speculate safely with money that they can afford to lose. Money that the client cannot afford to lose should never be risked in these speculations

For more than 20 years, nearly all of Financial Safety Services clients to date have been found via direct [i.e off-line, in-person] referral from previously satisfied clients only.

No attempts are made to procure clientele via the selling of the sporadic, deliberately incomplete online information posted at this site. All valuable information is sold to clients, via e-mail, or preferably in person, on a "need to know" customized basis, depending on their specific speculative wants/needs.

Therefor any/all posts at this site are for the reference and possible benefit of pre-existing , real-world, paying clients only as part of my services [and to perhaps help emphasize a particular point I make to them in private], and never for the benefit of the general reading public and casual internet reader at large.

Internet posts arer not made on a regular schedule in order to build an on-line audience; only when I feel that so doing is beneficial to my actual existing clientele.

I have no interest in gaining clients first hand from any posts made either here or elsewhere [if it happens, it happens!] - as I previously stated, to date [20 years+], nearly all of my previous clients have come to me via direct, in-person referral from other satisfied clients- that is, [1]an existing client personally recommends my services to a close friend, [2] the friend contacts me, [3]we discuss their wants/needs, [4] I make a decision as to whether or not I can really help them, [5] We come to a financial agreement- or not :-) .

None- Client Questions?

Should a casual reader/none client have a serious question about an assertion I make on this site, they must write to me at: onebornfreeatyahoodotcom and I will do my best to answer their question. Their first question will usually be answered for free. After that, fees may apply.

Current Client Questions.

All existing, paying client questions are of course, answered for free [usually via private e-mail]- it is part of the service!
onebornfreeatyahoodotcom

******************************************************************************************