Friday, June 7, 2013
[Onebornfree/Financial Safety Services commentary: this might be a very important article for you, dear reader! Mr Bonner points out what you'd think is obvious, and yet, outside of Austrian economic theory, almost the entire field of economics and associated professions [e.g. banking, investment consulting, financial advisory services, money management etc.] is in fact based on the exact opposite assumption, [i.e. the overtly mechanistic, "scientific""Economic Man" assumption ] ; that is, that we are not all totally unique individuals with unique tastes and values etc. that constantly change, but that we are all in fact essentially alike, with more or less similar likes, dislikes, life-goals goals etc etc. ,and that "therefor", the broad mass of individuals actions can be safely predicted ahead of time for any given economic scenario by a bunch of "trained" professionals [read "seers"] who can consult their charts, then look down their noses into the future and make grandiose "certain" assumptions about how you and almost everybody else will be acting next week, next year, or the next decade, and how those actions will influence the economy overall. Of course, this moronic, economic man model has been shown to entirely false by economists such as Karl Menger, Ludwig Von Mises, and Murray Rothbard, and as a result, the undying pomposity and self -assuredness of the many "seers" who make their living "predicting" future economic events [e.g. this man], and who constantly pontificate/bloviate about "stimulating the economy" etc. has been repeatedly exposed; and yet so far, still, despite these "seers" obvious almost complete failure in consistently predicting future economic events, to no avail - most people would apparently still rather continue to believe this broad mass of economic and investment "seers" and bloviators etc. Sad but true. Question: Are you going to continue to believe the bloviators and their "economic predictions"? Regards, onebornfree.]
"Yesterday, the markets reversed direction, albeit timidly. The Dow fell 19 points. Gold rose $19 per ounce.
And if there is anyone who knows what these markets will do tomorrow, he doesn't work at the Diary of a Rogue Economist.
The Rise of the Technicians
Before coming to California and Mississippi, we gave a speech in London. In it we quoted economist Paul Krugman. Here's the quote, from an article in The New York Times:
Keynesian economics rests fundamentally on the proposition that macroeconomics isn't a morality play – that depressions are essentially a technical malfunction. As the Great Depression deepened, Keynes famously declared that "we have magneto trouble" – i.e., the economy's troubles were like those of a car with a small but critical problem in its electrical system, and the job of the economist is to figure out how to repair that technical problem.
What kind of brain could think such a thing? How could you confuse an economy with a machine? We promise not to become earnest about it, but it is probably worth spending a few minutes exploring this claptrap.
It is the fatal flaw at the heart of modern economics. It also happens to be the foundation of the Fed's attempt to revive the economy. Krugman, Bernanke, Summers et al. think they are technicians...
They've got the wrong metaphor. You may be able to describe the human body as a machine too. But don't try to fix it with an adjustable wrench. It's a good thing Paul Krugman isn't a medical doctor!
Unlike a machine, an economy was neither designed by anyone nor built in a factory. There are no plans... no owner's manual... no guide to troubleshooting problems... and no website where owners go to talk about the problems they've had and the tricks they've used to fix them.
Not made by man... it cannot be repaired by man. But let's look at why this is so.
The Economy Is Not a Machine
First, an economy is a "complex adaptive system." It has lots of moving parts, in other words, and each of these parts has information and desires of its own.
The farmer in Mississippi may know that his bottom 40 acres are too wet to plow. The Department of Agriculture has no idea. The plumber in Milwaukee may know that his business is slowing down. But how would Krugman know?
What machine has intelligent parts... each responding to its own information base, more or less independently?
Second... and perhaps more importantly... the parts have desires of their own. You build a machine to accomplish the desires of the designer. An economy, on the other hand, is merely a way for the constituent parts to achieve their own ends.
Imagine an automobile that goes where the steering wheel wants to go! Imagine a motor that runs faster when the carburetor feels frisky... and slows down when the valves get tired.
You can see that this is like no machine ever created. The parts want to go in different directions... at different speeds... for different reasons. The economy is much more like a flock of birds than a Boeing 747.
In today's America, real (inflation-adjusted) wages are lower today than they were 10 years ago. Depending on how you adjust for inflation, they may be as low as they were at the end of the second Eisenhower administration.
With so little in earnings, people are naturally careful with their money. They go to giant discount shops... in order to get as much for their money as possible. They want low prices.
What is an economy for, if not to satisfy the hopes and desires of the people who live in it? And what is the goal of activist economics, if not to help people get what they want?
So what does Paul Krugman do?
He urges the government to raise consumer prices – to consciously and intentionally sabotage the wishes of the people by raising the cost of living. That's the point of QE: to put more money in circulation so that prices rise. Then people will get less for their earnings and savings... and be more eager to spend now, rather than saving for later (rightly fearing that their dollars will lose value over time).
And that's why Krugman prefers to think of an economy as a machine. Machines can be manipulated and controlled. Real economies can't."