Onebornfree's Financial Safety Reports

Monday, July 1, 2013

Are We All "Fking Fked!" ?

Click on image to enlarge
[Financial Safety Services commentary: Here's Bill Bonner to prove to us all that economics and investment articles do not have to be dry and humorless Heck, they can even be "x-rated" and still profound, in the right hands. On the other hand, despite what is revealed in my graph above this commentary which dramatically illustrates what the Federal Reserve has been up to for the past few years, it does not mean that his dire prediction will necessarily come true, or, at the very least, it does not have to come true for you. Financial Safety Services main goal is to show individuals how to protect their precious long term savings from the type of shenanigans outlined by my graph and by Mr Bonner's text- and even how to safely speculate with money you can afford to lose -should you be lucky enough to have any "play money" in these troubled times. Bottom line: you do not have to be F**king F**ked . Enjoy! ]

Bill Bonner

"Neil Barofsky, the federal employee in charge of auditing the TARP program, says the "U.S. is pretty f**ked." The Huffington Post reports that he is not the first to resort to the F-word to describe Americans' situation:

Christina Romer... the former chair of President Obama's Council of Economic Advisers, told Bill Maher last year that the U.S. was "pretty darned f**ked" on the night that Standard and Poor's downgraded the country's credit rating.   Another Washington official known for his testy language? None other than Tim "I have been the most f**king transparent secretary of the Treasury in this country's entire f**king history!" Geithner.

Yesterday, we found out that whatever it takes to bring about a real f**king recovery... with real f**king growth... and real f**king prosperity... central banks don't have it.

All they have is the ability to manipulate the credit market... and print more money. If that's all it took to make people wealthy, Zimbabweans would be the wealthiest f**king people on Earth, followed by the f**king Argentines.

And now we discover that, despite f**king Herculean efforts on the part of central bankers, more and more of the world economy is nevertheless still f**ked.

Central banks doubled their f**king assets (and the foundation of the world's money supply) in just four short years. The Bank of England was particularly energetic. It tripled its f**king assets. But the recession in Britain continues. And in the U.S., another f**king recession may be here already. If not, it's probably right around the f**king corner.

McDonald's sales are at a two-year low. If you can't afford a f**king Big Mac, what can you afford? Economist David Rosenberg, at Gluskin Sheff, says export orders are collapsing too. The last two times this happened, we were in a f**king recession. From Bloomberg:

Exports appear to be collapsing around the world. Data out of Germany this morning showed exports falling 1.9%, and South Korea, the canary in the coal mine, has seen exports crumble.

Now, Gluskin Sheff's David Rosenberg writes that soon we'll find "that the U.S. prints a negative-GDP reading on the back of a negative export shock that does not appear to be in any forecast."
He writes that 70% of real GDP growth since the "recovery" began three years ago has come from export volumes and inventory investment.

In fact, Rosenberg points out that there is an 81% correlation between annual growth in U.S. exports and ISM new orders, and that this level of new export orders coincided with the last two recessions.
And yesterday came the official announcement that France, too, is in a f**king recession.

"France is f**ked," said a friend at dinner last night.

"Everything is rigged... and re-rigged. France's Socialist president, Francois Hollande, is a rich man. He has three houses on the Cote d'Azur. But he claims to hate the rich. And gets votes by promising to punish rich people with higher taxes.

"They're already doubling the wealth tax. And now they're putting the income tax up to 75%. Of course, it doesn't really matter. It applies only to people earning more than a million a year. And hardly anybody earns that kind of money in France. If you're going to earn that much, you go somewhere else.
"So they say it's mostly symbolic. But symbolic of what? It's a symbol of a stupid, hypocritical government... that pretends that it can treat people who create wealth as though they were milk cows. It squeezes them dry... and then kicks them in the ass.

"And you know what? I can do something symbolic too. I can leave France."

Which is why France is f**ked. People with any gumption leave. They can move to London. They can move to Geneva. They can move to Brussels. They can live well in any of those cities.
Another guest at last night's dinner party was a farmer:

"I went to a meeting hosted by our regional farm bureau last week. They were explaining to us all of the wonderful things they are doing for us. They had a PowerPoint presentation... with great photos of them at work... showing all of the resources we had to work with.

"What they didn't bother to talk about was how costly all of their 'help' has become. In Europe, there are now five bureaucrats working in some area of agricultural administration for every one farmer. And these people increase a farmer's workload. Now I spend half of my time filling out the forms that these people require... or being inspected... or complying with some new rule or regulation.

"So when they got to the end of the presentation, they asked if there were any questions. I stood up. I said, 'I'd like to make a proposal. Since there are now five administrative people in the agricultural sector for every farmer... and since every farmer must spend half of his time dealing with the admin people... I propose that each farmer be given one paper pusher to work for him exclusively. That paper pusher's job will be to push the papers back to the other paper pushers.

"'You can plainly see the advantage of such a system. It will cost nothing. No jobs will be lost. And it will free farmers from doing things that aren't productive. In theory, it should double a farmer's productivity. So everyone will be better off.'

"The guy from the farm bureau just muttered something, and then they closed the meeting."
Our friend did not say so. But farmers are f**ked by the f**king farm bureaucracy.

But so what? We're all f**ked, because whatever the f**king central bankers have got, it ain't f**king enough to bring about real f**king growth in the real f**king economy.

And as we saw yesterday, the central bankers and central planners are the ones who f**ked up the economy in the first place. And now the only thing that would bring real growth is the very thing they refuse to do: Stop f**king with it!"

*****************************

FINANCIAL SAFETY SERVICES DISCLAIMER:

Financial Safety Services is NOT an investment advisory service. Financial Safety Services is an educational service that teaches the interested individual non-original [i.e. invented by others far more intelligent than myself], time-tested safe methods/principles that might be successfully used by the individual for relatively low risk speculations in various financial markets.

ACCURACY OF INFORMATION : Financial Safety Services MAKES NO CLAIMS AS TO THE ACCURACY OF ANY INFORMATION EITHER GIVEN AT THIS BLOG SITE, OR IN PERSON TO PAYING CLIENTS. All information given/sold, must be understood to have been acted on AT THE INDIVIDUALS OWN RISK .

********************************************************************

More About Financial Safety Services

[Free phone consultations via "Skype". To set a time/date email: onebornfreeatyahoodotcom ]

Financial Safety Services is a private , mostly off-line, international, person to person consulting service that attempts to show its real-time [i.e. non-internet derived] clients how to speculate safely with money that they can afford to lose. Money that the client cannot afford to lose should never be risked in these speculations

For more than 20 years, nearly all of Financial Safety Services clients to date have been found via direct [i.e off-line, in-person] referral from previously satisfied clients only.

No attempts are made to procure clientele via the selling of the sporadic, deliberately incomplete online information posted at this site. All valuable information is sold to clients, via e-mail, or preferably in person, on a "need to know" customized basis, depending on their specific speculative wants/needs.

Therefor any/all posts at this site are for the reference and possible benefit of pre-existing , real-world, paying clients only as part of my services [and to perhaps help emphasize a particular point I make to them in private], and never for the benefit of the general reading public and casual internet reader at large.

Internet posts arer not made on a regular schedule in order to build an on-line audience; only when I feel that so doing is beneficial to my actual existing clientele.

I have no interest in gaining clients first hand from any posts made either here or elsewhere [if it happens, it happens!] - as I previously stated, to date [20 years+], nearly all of my previous clients have come to me via direct, in-person referral from other satisfied clients- that is, [1]an existing client personally recommends my services to a close friend, [2] the friend contacts me, [3]we discuss their wants/needs, [4] I make a decision as to whether or not I can really help them, [5] We come to a financial agreement- or not :-) .

None- Client Questions?

Should a casual reader/none client have a serious question about an assertion I make on this site, they must write to me at: onebornfreeatyahoodotcom and I will do my best to answer their question. Their first question will usually be answered for free. After that, fees may apply.

Current Client Questions.

All existing, paying client questions are of course, answered for free [usually via private e-mail]- it is part of the service!

onebornfreeatyahoodotcom

******************************************************************************************

Friday, June 7, 2013

Man [and the Economy] Is _Not_ a Machine!- Bill Bonner

[Onebornfree/Financial Safety Services commentary: this might be a very important article for you, dear reader! Mr Bonner points out what you'd think is obvious, and yet, outside of Austrian economic theory, almost the entire field of economics and associated professions [e.g. banking, investment consulting, financial advisory services, money management etc.] is in fact based on the exact opposite assumption, [i.e. the overtly mechanistic, "scientific""Economic Man" assumption ] ; that is, that we are not all totally unique individuals with unique tastes and values etc. that constantly change, but that we are all in fact essentially alike, with more or less similar likes, dislikes, life-goals goals etc etc. ,and that "therefor", the broad mass of individuals actions can be safely predicted ahead of time for any given economic scenario by a bunch of "trained" professionals [read "seers"] who can consult their charts, then look down their noses into the future and make grandiose "certain" assumptions about how you and almost everybody else will be acting next week, next year, or the next decade, and how those actions will influence the economy overall. Of course, this moronic, economic man model has been shown to entirely false by economists such as Karl Menger, Ludwig Von Mises, and Murray Rothbard, and as a result, the undying pomposity and self -assuredness of the many "seers" who make their living "predicting" future economic events [e.g. this man], and who constantly pontificate/bloviate about "stimulating the economy" etc. has been repeatedly exposed; and yet so far, still, despite these "seers" obvious almost complete failure in consistently predicting future economic events, to no avail - most people would apparently still rather continue to believe this broad mass of economic and investment "seers" and bloviators etc. Sad but true. Question: Are you going to continue to believe the bloviators and their "economic predictions"? Regards, onebornfree.]

Bill Bonner

"Yesterday, the markets reversed direction, albeit timidly. The Dow fell 19 points. Gold rose $19 per ounce.

And if there is anyone who knows what these markets will do tomorrow, he doesn't work at the Diary of a Rogue Economist.

The Rise of the Technicians

Before coming to California and Mississippi, we gave a speech in London. In it we quoted economist Paul Krugman. Here's the quote, from an article in The New York Times:

Keynesian economics rests fundamentally on the proposition that macroeconomics isn't a morality play – that depressions are essentially a technical malfunction. As the Great Depression deepened, Keynes famously declared that "we have magneto trouble" – i.e., the economy's troubles were like those of a car with a small but critical problem in its electrical system, and the job of the economist is to figure out how to repair that technical problem.

What kind of brain could think such a thing? How could you confuse an economy with a machine? We promise not to become earnest about it, but it is probably worth spending a few minutes exploring this claptrap.

It is the fatal flaw at the heart of modern economics. It also happens to be the foundation of the Fed's attempt to revive the economy. Krugman, Bernanke, Summers et al. think they are technicians...

They've got the wrong metaphor. You may be able to describe the human body as a machine too. But don't try to fix it with an adjustable wrench. It's a good thing Paul Krugman isn't a medical doctor!

Unlike a machine, an economy was neither designed by anyone nor built in a factory. There are no plans... no owner's manual... no guide to troubleshooting problems... and no website where owners go to talk about the problems they've had and the tricks they've used to fix them.

Not made by man... it cannot be repaired by man. But let's look at why this is so.

The Economy Is Not a Machine

First, an economy is a "complex adaptive system." It has lots of moving parts, in other words, and each of these parts has information and desires of its own.

The farmer in Mississippi may know that his bottom 40 acres are too wet to plow. The Department of Agriculture has no idea. The plumber in Milwaukee may know that his business is slowing down. But how would Krugman know?

What machine has intelligent parts... each responding to its own information base, more or less independently?

Second... and perhaps more importantly... the parts have desires of their own. You build a machine to accomplish the desires of the designer. An economy, on the other hand, is merely a way for the constituent parts to achieve their own ends.

Imagine an automobile that goes where the steering wheel wants to go! Imagine a motor that runs faster when the carburetor feels frisky... and slows down when the valves get tired.

You can see that this is like no machine ever created. The parts want to go in different directions... at different speeds... for different reasons. The economy is much more like a flock of birds than a Boeing 747.

In today's America, real (inflation-adjusted) wages are lower today than they were 10 years ago. Depending on how you adjust for inflation, they may be as low as they were at the end of the second Eisenhower administration.

With so little in earnings, people are naturally careful with their money. They go to giant discount shops... in order to get as much for their money as possible. They want low prices.

What is an economy for, if not to satisfy the hopes and desires of the people who live in it? And what is the goal of activist economics, if not to help people get what they want?

So what does Paul Krugman do?

He urges the government to raise consumer prices – to consciously and intentionally sabotage the wishes of the people by raising the cost of living. That's the point of QE: to put more money in circulation so that prices rise. Then people will get less for their earnings and savings... and be more eager to spend now, rather than saving for later (rightly fearing that their dollars will lose value over time).

And that's why Krugman prefers to think of an economy as a machine. Machines can be manipulated and controlled. Real economies can't."